Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
 Physics & Technology of Multi-slice CT
  • James Weston
  • ImPACT
2
Aims
  • Some key factors about MSCT
    • construction of scanners
    • reconstruction techniques
    • artefacts
    • other factors

  • Concepts and ideas
    • keep it non-mathematical!



3
MSCT scanners




  • 1991 Dual slice
  • 1998 Four slice
  • 2002 16 slice
  • 2003 32 slice
  • today
    • 64 sub-mm slices
    • 0.4 s rotation

4
Clinical scanners
5
The 3 Fs of CT

  • Faster




  • Further





  • Finer
6
Isotropic imaging
  • 2D pixel in a CT image represents a 3D voxel
  • Resolution is ideal when equal in all 3 dimensions
    • best results with slice thickness equal to (axial) pixel size
    • routine 0.5 - 1 mm slice thickness achieves this goal
7
Scanner design
8
“Third generation” CT scanners
  • Tube & detectors
    • rotate around patient gathering x-ray projections
  • Projection data used to form slice images
    • filtered back projection
9
Helical CT
  • Continuous gantry rotation  +  continuous table feed
  • Scan data traces a helical path - or ‘spiral’ - around patient
    • data used to form axial images
10
Multi-slice CT scanning
  • Many features in common with single slice (SSCT)
    • multiple parallel detector banks along z-axis
    • enables a number of projections
       to be acquired simultaneously


11
MSCT scanning: in scale
12
Detector banks



  • Array extends in 2 directions
    • xy-plane
      • arc to collect many samples for each projection
    • z-axis
      • along the patient length
  • SSCT
    • z-axis coverage: one element
  • MSCT
    • many z-axis elements
13
Slices & detectors
  • Just 4 detectors reduces options for scanning


  • Narrow coverage
    • eg. 5 mm
      for d=1.25 mm


14
Slice width selection: 4 slice
  • For more flexibility
    AND
    greater coverage
    need more detectors
  • Can collect data from groupings of detectors
    • individual detectors
      • 4 x d
    • pairs
      • 4 x 2d
    • triples
      • 4 x 3d

15
Slice options: real example
  • GE LightSpeed
    • 4 slices
    • 16 detectors in z-axis
16
Slice options: real example
  • GE LightSpeed
    • 4 slices
    • 16 detectors
  • Detector output combined to define data acquisition width
  • Coverage up to 20 mm
17
Adaptive arrays
  • Detector elements not all same size
    • e.g. Toshiba Aquillion series
18
 
19
64 slice scanners
20
64-Slice CT: double sampling
  • z-flying focal spot
  • 32 detectors -> 64 data channels


21
? CT
  • Multi-slice CT MSCT
  • Multi-detector CT MDCT
  • Multi-channel CT MCCT
  • Multi-row CT (MRCT less common as abbreviation)



  • All effectively the same thing


  • Note: care when using “SSCT”
    • normally used for single slice
    • can sometimes refer to single source
      • check the context
22
Design considerations
  • Scan gantry
    • mechanical stresses
    • data & power feed
  • Tubes
    • high currents
      • narrow slices; fast rotations
    • tube cooling
    • generator response
  • Detectors
    • responsive
    • efficient
    • small
  • Electronics / computers / reconstruction hardware



23
More challenges for MSCT
  • Reconstruction


  • Artefacts


  • Dose efficiency


  • Data management



24
Using helical data
  • Single slice: interpolate using 2 nearest data points
25
Using helical data
  • Single slice: interpolate using 2 nearest data points
  • Up to 8 slice MSCT: use all data within a variable ‘filter width’ for interpolation
26
Flexibility of reconstruction
  • ‘Overlapping’ reconstructions
    • better z-axis resolution
    • better 3D imaging

27
Artefacts
  • All standard (SS) CT artefacts can still occur
    • ring artefact
    • beam hardening


  • Specific issues for MSCT
    • cone beam
    • helical artefacts
28
Cone beam artefacts
  • Seen as streaks in image as number of slices increases


  • Due to large cone angles and narrow slices


29
"As number of slices increases"
  • As number of slices increases, beam is more diverging, outer slices are distorted
  • Negligible up to 8 slices, significant for 16 slice scanners


30
Cone beam artefact
  • Beyond 8 slices,
    special reconstructions needed to avoid cone beam artefacts
  • Range of techniques are used
    • tilted (hyperplane,
      or non-orthogonal)
    • 3D (Feldkamp / FDK) reconstructions
31
Tilted reconstruction
  • ASSR techniques uses tilted reconstructions
    • images back projected along optimal oblique planes
    • reconstructed images then filtered to produce axial images
32
3D reconstruction
  • Feldkamp based three dimensional reconstructions
    • extension of back projection to third dimension
    • requires more computing power
33
Effectiveness of cone beam algorithms
34
Helical artefacts
  • Conical phantom
  • single-slice helical
  • Spherical air pocket
  •  8 x 2.5 mm slice helical
35
Helical artefacts - clinically
36
Windmill artefact in consecutive slices
  • Teflon rod at 60° to horizontal





37
Helical artefact
  • Processing can compensate for helical scanning
  • Reduces artefact
38
MSCT and dose
  • CT is a high-dose exam
    • more CT studies being undertaken
    • even more exams with new MSCT apps

  • Automatic exposure controls (AEC)


  • Differences between single and multi-slice
    • over-beaming
    • over-ranging
39
Z-axis over-beaming
  • Beams are wider than the nominal value
    • due to finite size of focal spot
  • Irradiated beam width ~ 3mm wider
    • e.g. 4 x 2.5 mm slices, 12.5 mm beam
  • Less significant as beam width  increases
    • wider collimations routinely used
40
Wider beams – lower dose
  • Efficiency increases with collimation (beam width)
  • More coverage means thin slices at lower dose
41
Overranging
  • To image entire volume, data is needed at both ends of scan
    • requires more rotations to acquire
  • This is more significant for multi-slice, wider beams, and for short scan ranges
42
Data explosion!
  • Scan data throughput from gantry to computer
    • Single slice, 1 second rotation : ~ 2 megabytes per second
    • 4 slice, 0.5 s rot : 16 MB/s
    • 16 slice, 0.5 s rot : 64 MB/s
    • 64 slice, 0.5 s rot : 256 MB/s
  • Image production speed
    • 2005: ~ 64 MB/s
  • Data processing burden
  • Network traffic …
  • Archive issues…
  • Images per exam
  • Image viewing capacity?


43
Reporting & navigation tools
44
In summary
  • Multislice CT scanning has progressed hugely since 1998
    • there are challenges that arise with MSCT – and have been met
      • eg ConeBeam reconstructions

  • 16 and 64 slice changes CT
    from slice to volume scanning
    • image quality can now be routinely isotropic
    • 3D data sets readily available
    • data sets are there to be explored flexibly


  • New applications still developing
  • … and new scanners coming


45
Acknowledgements
  • for scanner information & images
    • GE Healthcare
    • Philips Medical
    • Siemens
    • Toshiba
    • University of Erlangen
    • Matthew Benbow, RBCH


  • Thanks also due to
    • Sue, Maria and Margaret at ImPACT
    • David Platten & Nick Keat


46
Physics & Technology of Multislice CT