|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Some key factors about MSCT
- construction of scanners
- reconstruction techniques
- artefacts
- other factors
- Concepts and ideas
- keep it non-mathematical!
|
|
3
|
- 1991 Dual slice
- 1998 Four slice
- 2002 16 slice
- 2003 32 slice
- today
- 64 sub-mm slices
- 0.4 s rotation
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- 2D pixel in a CT image represents a 3D voxel
- Resolution is ideal when equal in all 3 dimensions
- best results with slice thickness equal to (axial) pixel size
- routine 0.5 - 1 mm slice thickness achieves this goal
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Tube & detectors
- rotate around patient gathering x-ray projections
- Projection data used to form slice images
|
|
9
|
- Continuous gantry rotation + continuous table feed
- Scan data traces a helical path - or ‘spiral’ - around patient
- data used to form axial images
|
|
10
|
- Many features in common with single slice (SSCT)
- multiple parallel detector banks along z-axis
- enables a number of projections
to be acquired
simultaneously
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Array extends in 2 directions
- xy-plane
- arc to collect many samples for each projection
- z-axis
- SSCT
- z-axis coverage: one element
- MSCT
|
|
13
|
- Just 4 detectors reduces options for scanning
- Narrow coverage
|
|
14
|
- For more flexibility
AND
greater coverage
need more detectors
- Can collect data from groupings of detectors
- individual detectors
- pairs
- triples
|
|
15
|
- GE LightSpeed
- 4 slices
- 16 detectors in z-axis
|
|
16
|
- GE LightSpeed
- Detector output combined to define data acquisition width
- Coverage up to 20 mm
|
|
17
|
- Detector elements not all same size
- e.g. Toshiba Aquillion series
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- z-flying focal spot
- 32 detectors -> 64 data channels
|
|
21
|
- Multi-slice CT MSCT
- Multi-detector CT MDCT
- Multi-channel CT MCCT
- Multi-row CT (MRCT less common as abbreviation)
- All effectively the same thing
- Note: care when using “SSCT”
- normally used for single slice
- can sometimes refer to single source
|
|
22
|
- Scan gantry
- mechanical stresses
- data & power feed
- Tubes
- high currents
- narrow slices; fast rotations
- tube cooling
- generator response
- Detectors
- responsive
- efficient
- small
- Electronics / computers / reconstruction hardware
|
|
23
|
- Reconstruction
- Artefacts
- Dose efficiency
- Data management
|
|
24
|
- Single slice: interpolate using 2 nearest data points
|
|
25
|
- Single slice: interpolate using 2 nearest data points
- Up to 8 slice MSCT: use all data within a variable ‘filter width’ for
interpolation
|
|
26
|
- ‘Overlapping’ reconstructions
- better z-axis resolution
- better 3D imaging
|
|
27
|
- All standard (SS) CT artefacts can still occur
- ring artefact
- beam hardening
- Specific issues for MSCT
- cone beam
- helical artefacts
|
|
28
|
- Seen as streaks in image as number of slices increases
- Due to large cone angles and narrow slices
|
|
29
|
- As number of slices increases, beam is more diverging, outer slices are
distorted
- Negligible up to 8 slices, significant for 16 slice scanners
|
|
30
|
- Beyond 8 slices,
special reconstructions needed to avoid cone beam artefacts
- Range of techniques are used
- tilted (hyperplane,
or non-orthogonal)
- 3D (Feldkamp / FDK) reconstructions
|
|
31
|
- ASSR techniques uses tilted reconstructions
- images back projected along optimal oblique planes
- reconstructed images then filtered to produce axial images
|
|
32
|
- Feldkamp based three dimensional reconstructions
- extension of back projection to third dimension
- requires more computing power
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Conical phantom
- single-slice helical
- Spherical air pocket
- 8 x 2.5 mm slice helical
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Teflon rod at 60° to
horizontal
|
|
37
|
- Processing can compensate for helical scanning
- Reduces artefact
|
|
38
|
- CT is a high-dose exam
- more CT studies being undertaken
- even more exams with new MSCT apps
- Automatic exposure controls (AEC)
- Differences between single and multi-slice
- over-beaming
- over-ranging
|
|
39
|
- Beams are wider than the nominal value
- due to finite size of focal spot
- Irradiated beam width ~ 3mm wider
- e.g. 4 x 2.5 mm slices, 12.5 mm beam
- Less significant as beam width
increases
- wider collimations routinely used
|
|
40
|
- Efficiency increases with collimation (beam width)
- More coverage means thin slices at lower dose
|
|
41
|
- To image entire volume, data is needed at both ends of scan
- requires more rotations to acquire
- This is more significant for multi-slice, wider beams, and for short
scan ranges
|
|
42
|
- Scan data throughput from gantry to computer
- Single slice, 1 second rotation : ~ 2 megabytes per second
- 4 slice, 0.5 s rot : 16 MB/s
- 16 slice, 0.5 s rot : 64 MB/s
- 64 slice, 0.5 s rot : 256 MB/s
- Image production speed
- Data processing burden
- Network traffic …
- Archive issues…
- Images per exam
- Image viewing capacity?
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- Multislice CT scanning has progressed hugely since 1998
- there are challenges that arise with MSCT – and have been met
- eg ConeBeam reconstructions
- 16 and 64 slice changes CT
from slice to volume scanning
- image quality can now be routinely isotropic
- 3D data sets readily available
- data sets are there to be explored flexibly
- New applications still developing
- … and new scanners coming
|
|
45
|
- for scanner information & images
- GE Healthcare
- Philips Medical
- Siemens
- Toshiba
- University of Erlangen
- Matthew Benbow, RBCH
- Thanks also due to
- Sue, Maria and Margaret at ImPACT
- David Platten & Nick Keat
|
|
46
|
|