|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Image quality
- Image noise
- Spatial resolution
- Contrast
- Artefacts
- Radiation Dose
- Organ dose
- Effective dose
|
|
3
|
- Image quality
- Image noise
- Spatial resolution
- Contrast
- Artefacts
- Radiation Dose
- Organ dose
- Effective dose
|
|
4
|
- Many issues are the same in ss and ms
- General comments
- Specific comments to msct
- tend to relate to z-axis features
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Spatial resolution (z-axis)
- Pitch
- Dose issues
- Reconstruction algorithm
- What image quality do we want?
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Scan plane (limited by pixel size)
- Z-axis (image slice width)
|
|
12
|
- Imaged slice width
- Influences partial volume artefacts
- Affects contrast and noise
- In MSCT
- Flexibility of reconstructing different slice widths
- In helical generally (SS and MS)
- Optimised by reconstructing overlapping slices
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Image width affects contrast and noise of object
- Optimised slice width: imaged slice » object size
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Image width depended on beam width
- And post patient collimation for thin slices
|
|
19
|
- Image width depends on detector acquisition width
- eg 4 x 5mm, will not give a 2.5 mm slice! (Use 8 x 2.5)
- May be optimised in helical
- with closer z-axis sampling
(eg z-sharp in Siemens, or certain overlapping pitches)
|
|
20
|
- Image width depends on detector acquisition width
- eg 4 x 5mm, will not give a 2.5 mm slice! (Use 8 x 2.5)
- May be optimised in helical
- with closer z-axis sampling
(eg z-sharp in Siemens, or certain overlapping pitches)
|
|
21
|
- Visualisation optimised by overlapping reconstructions (viewed by cine
or 3-D)
|
|
22
|
- Overlapping reconstructions recommended for optimum contrast and z-axis
resolution
- ½ to 2/3rds overlap recommended
|
|
23
|
- SSCT vs MSCT
- Dose
- Noise
- Image slice thickness
- Artefacts
|
|
24
|
- Overlapping pitch – average dose increases
- Extended pitch – average dose lower
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- Beam width (overbeaming)
- Helical overscan (overranging)
|
|
32
|
- Penumbra typically 3 mm for all beam widths
- lower proportion of total dose with wider beam widths
- Wider is generally better
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Filter used in backprojection (convolution kernel)
- Smooth, standard, detail, bone
- AH30, AH40, AB50
- FC41, FC43 etc, etc
- Used to optimise spatial resolution against noise
|
|
35
|
- higher spatial frequency Ž more noise
- eg Smooth ® Standard ® Sharp
- noise = ~ 7 HU ® 17 HU ® 70 HU
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- High spatial detail
- Low contrast resolution
|
|
39
|
- What is an appropriate level of image noise ?
|
|
40
|
- What is an appropriate level of image noise ?
- too low – high dose
- too high – no diagnosis / missed diagnosis
- How do we find the optimum level?
|
|
41
|
- Systematic addition of noise to clinical images/raw data
- Studies for a variety of clinical conditions and scanners
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- Frush et al ‘Computer simulated radiation dose reduction for abdominal
multidetector CT of Pediatric patients’ AJR:179, November 2002
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
- Spatial resolution (z-axis)
- Pitch
- MSCT dose issues
- Reconstruction algorithm
- What image quality do we want?
|
|
57
|
|